At the world premiere of her documentary at the Isabel Bader theater in Toronto, Min Sook Lee admitted she had no idea what she was going to film when she started in January of 2004. She originally planned only to film six months in the life of Toronto city hall. It was only then that the police services board conflict suggested itself as a subject.

During the question and answer session after the screening, one attendee asked her if she was worried at any time about filming something that 'crossed' the Toronto police, chief Julian Fantino, and the police union. She was, she said, fairly worried about possible consequences.

This 'premiere' was on April 23rd, 2005, a few weeks after Fantino completed his five year contract as chief and handed control over to an interim chief. Advance tickets were sold out. People lined up around the block in pouring rain for rush tickets. A second screening was scheduled to meet the demand. The applause was exuberant; the audience liked what they saw.

It was the 'director's cut;' about 90 minutes. Min Sook announced that more showings were being planned, including a 45 minute version that will be broadcast by the CBC in a few months and a forthcoming full-length DVD version.

"Policing the police is tricky business, but in a democracy somebody's gotta do it," ran the promotion blurb for the documentary. While the phrase understates the effects of the experiences portrayed in the film, the film ultimately conveys that, to date, it is only the police that are policing themselves. The public, according to the filmmakers, still has little control over the institution whose mandate is to protect them. Our democracy, it seems, remains short of perfection.

Min Sook was given permission, presumably by board chair Alan Heisey, to film even when the regular media were barred from the room. This was granted, one assumes, in return for agreeing to keep the proceedings confidential for a suitable cooling off period. However, the police and their supporters could not have liked it. The viewer is left wondering how the police intimidation portrayed by the film was moderated by the presence of a camera, and how their actions might have differed had the camera not been present.

The camera recorded blunt admissions of the two police supporters on the services board, that they repeatedly left meetings with the intention of breaking quorum because they knew they were going to lose a vote, and to stop any attack on "The Chief." The two would not respond when asked what was motivating them, or when it was put to them that all this pressure was obviously coordinated.

Other scenes from the 'Hogtown:'

* Grim voices intoning that no politician can be seen as 'anti-police' and survive, but counterpoised with the news bites of police abuse of power, which the film shows increasing throughout Fantino's term.

* The police board's discovery that "The Chief" did not know how to read the police budget.

* The public, who gave the three vital support at public hearings, speaking up about the alienation of the city's poor, immigrant, and marginalized, brought about by the behavior and unaccountability of the police.

* Repeated camera shots of Fantino walking out of meeting rooms when the proceedings displeased him.

* Several people saying to the camera that they felt they were "being followed".

* The close-up of police board member and veteran city councillor Pam McConnell, eyes puffy and downcast, admitting that what she was being subjected to was making her feel ill.

* A mayor, who set this process in motion just after his election, but stayed in the background, delegating councillor McConnell to take the seat on the police board reserved for the mayor or his delegate.

* Repeated shots of the third board member, never speaking, never looking at the camera, but consistently voting against the defenders of "The Chief".

* The juvenile intimidation city councillors supporting "The Chief" were prepared to sink to, during the "last ditch" appeal of the police board decision to city council. From the balcony, the behavior of one councillor in cornering another in a side corridor was seen to cause rows of jaws to drop in unison.

At the end of the film, Fantino walked out of city hall, and, wide-eyed, claimed that he did not know why the board and the city council disliked him.

The audience burst into laughter.